Book Review: Reignited – Scientific Pathways to A Brighter Future

Disclaimer:  

First let me make it clear that I am an admirer of Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam. As a human, as an Indian, as a president, as a scientist, and as a Tamilian, he gave his best. No question on that. This review is solely on the book and not about the person. So Dr. Kalam's fans/followers please don't mistake this review for some anti-Kalam slander and bombard me with comments. If you wish to counter this review, just counter the points I have mentioned about the book. Thanks.

Introduction:

Shortly after the unexpected demise of Dr. Kalam, I was looking at the list of books he had authored. As most of the books are of self-development or motivational types (either in personal or national or global scales), one autobiography, one about his spiritual experience, one text book on fluid machanics and one book which talked about “scientific pathways”. What a wonder? From a scientist, it is the only book that seems to bring science for masses. Compare this with Dr. Hawking or Dr. Dawkins! You may understand why I feel sad about the numbers.

I ordered the book on an online store hoping that the book will introduce science to young people as well as have some good deal of information for a scientific novice like me. The book came in few days. It is around 250 pages and in two sittings I finished it off. I felt that “The book is kind of OK”, when I started to read and “Why this book is like this?” when I finished. I will list down the reasons why I am upset with the book. With all humility, I again say, I am not so good in science or language or anything. But whatever I express here are what made me unhappy about the book.

1. Book Organization

The book has an “Introduction”. The section doesn't introduce us to the content or intent of the book instead talks about an incident in the authors' life and moves on to talk about some incidents in Einstein's life. Then with a subtitle for each, it talks about Sir C. V. Raman, Michael Faraday and Alexander Graham Bell. Nothing much about the science behind their inventions but the “self-development” kind of “inspiring stories”. OK, forgiven for the introduction!

Then comes a Prologue. This is some kind of a science fiction short story mainly about Robots. As the first topic is Robotics, I thought that every topic will have such story. But this prologue without any reason appears only once and only for Robotics. I couldn't consider this as a prologue to the entire book as it is not talking about Pathology or Paleontology. So I still can't get the point of having a sci-fi short story as a prologue. OK. Lets move on!

The book has 7 different scientific topics, spread across 225 pages, apart from Introduction, Prologue, Acknowledgments. It has eight unnumbered pages of color photographs mostly from Getty Images. Don't look for some scientific diagrams or charts. You can expect few photos of Marie Curie, Galileo, robots, virus etc. The are some monochromatic pictures/diagrams sprinkled here and there. Some of them are informational while others are “Faraday sitting on his desk” or “Raman standing on a ship”.

Each section has something about the topic for 2 to 5 pages, another 2 to 5 pages about the future of the topic. Then a Q&A section titled “Conversation With A Science Teacher” and another Q&A with an Expert (Expert for 3 out of 7 topics is none other than Dr. Kalam himself). This is followed by “Note To Parents”, a section that ensures that the topic will surely land their kids in a good job and there are foreign opportunities for study and work. There is an “Oath” section for the kids to write down their oath. And some topics have an “Exercise” section while some topics lack the same.

2. Too Much for Too Little

This is something subjective. But still, the book gives too much importance, space and coverage to things of little importance. I like to highlight few of such cases below.

a) The book has 7 pages on Michael Faraday's personal struggles. It seems like a perfect plot for a self-motivation short-film. The introduction section itself is 16 pages long out of which Faraday takes a good share of 7 pages. The reason seems to me, is to create a mind-set among the young that they should not question the existing system or status quo. Just they have to work hard, should not complain and will become what they want one day. Sadly that is not true for many and I am not a fan of such new-age motivational stories. Ultimately, page 15 has something like what you hear from Deepak Chopra or Rhonda Byrne “...in face of their determination the universe came together to enable them to succeed”. Yuk!

b) In Space Science topic, 5 pages document about the Galileo Affair. It is good to point out the friction between science and religion in Medieval Europe. But those 5 pages can be utilized to cover from Plato to Aryabhatta of the old and from Galileo to Hawking of our very own time covering various stages and progresses in the field. First manned mission, journey to moon, developments in Mars etc are left to footnote propotions.

c) In the same topic's (Space Science) expert section, there are only two questions. One is about what inspired Dr. Kalam to take up space science. The second is about the land acquisition made for Thumba Space Research Center. This second question takes up 4 pages and it is all about a Bishop of a Church giving up the land of Church, his house and the houses of the villagers for the space center. OK, what does this story have to do with the “scientific pathway” for space science? Is this for preparing young minds to support land acquisition bill or what? The section ends like this “Professor Vikram Sarabhai and Rev. Peter Bernard Pereira may not be with us anymore, but their work, which has been instrumental in the birth of India's space missions, truly lives on.” giving equal credit to the scientist who worked for the founding of the research center and the Bishop who gave the land which is not his personal property! So the moral seems to be this: "If you give up your land for some project, you will be counted as a person who made a “scientific pathway” along with the scientists who worked on the project!"

So, instead of discussing on actual science of technology, the book deviates largely in to self-help style “experiences” and “stories”, which is nothing else but disappointing.

3. Errors and Typos

Even though the book is on science, there are error and typos which may be quiet misleading. As a novice in science, I myself have found some of them. I am presenting few of them I could remember when I glance back the pages now.

a) The book confuses a computer bug with virus. Bugs are human errors in programming which results in unexpected behavior of the program. Viruses are developed with intention to harm the system. But the book says that bugs can be sorted out just like anti-virus software cleans the computer in page 35. In medical sense you can call a virus as a bug. But not so in computer science.

b) The book mentions that nicotine is a carcinogen (page 101). But the current understanding is that nicotine is not carcinogen (at least in the doses humans consume and that is why nicotine gums are safer) but other chemicals in tobacco or tobacco smoke are. This is a pardonable mistake for non-science books. But for a scientific book? Also the book has some confusion about cancer. The books states that cancer can not be induced by bacteria or virus which is not exactly true. Some viruses increase the risk of cancer like the same way smoking or pollution increases the risk. One example is HPV.

c) On page 240, the book says that the Holocene Epoch started 1.25 mya (million years ago) i.e. 1,250,000 years ago, which is wrong. Holocene epoch had begun just 11,700 years ago. The book has the same error on the same page for the end date of Pleistocene epoch too!

d) On page 96, the size of a Red blood cell is given as 12 micrometer, which is actually 6 to 8 micrometer in diameter or 20 to 25 micrometer in circumference or 2 to 2.5 micrometer of thickness. I don't know what size this 12 micrometer represents.

e) On page 237, it is mentioned that the evolution from single celled prokaryotes to modern life forms like humans took 2000 billion years! It should be 2000 million years or just 2 billion years. Typo? Forgiven! 

f) On Page 142, the distance traveled by light in one year (light year) is given as 95 followed by 11 zeros in words (which is correct) and 9,50,00,00,00,00,000 km in numbers (which is actually 95 followed by 12 zeros and hence wrong. Again in words, it is mentioned as 95 trillion which is wrong. It should be 9.5 trillion kilometers.

These are few of the mistakes/errors I have come across. I may be wrong in some or there may be more such which a knowledgeable person can find out!

4. East vs West?

There is an East vs West problem in the book. No! Not between people. But between the number system. The book in most places use Western names for numbers (millions, billions) in words and use Indian comma system in figures which is quiet confusing. The errors like the one in light year's distance could have been avoided to sticking to any one system properly! I think this will confuse young readers a bit as this problem runs throughout the book.

Not only the numbers, even titles of people are confused between West and East. In Acknowledgments, almost all the people are addressed Mr or Ms but in the last paragraph three persons are addressed with Shri! Though this is irrelevant, there is a striking similarity between numbers and people in the East-West confusion aspect!

Conclusion:

So this book seems to be more of a self-help/motivation book than a popular science book. Actually it is a dangerous mixture of both, as I consider both scientific errors and self-help dangerous, especially for young readers. As I have pointed out in my earlier blog post about MBA, it seems the co-author, who is a person from management stream may be a contributing factor for the sorry state of the book. So, if you are looking at this book as a popular science book for young readers, like me, think again!